Watch Summer Camp Elevated On-Demand featuring MNTN, Snowflake, Byte, Ollie, and so much more.
< Back to FAQs

What’s the Difference Between Multi-Channel Attribution and Multi-Touch Attribution?

Multi-channel attribution (MCA) and multi-touch attribution (MTA) are often used interchangeably but technically they have some distinct differences.

Multi-Channel Attribution (MCA):

  • Focus: Evaluates the overall performance of different marketing channels.
  • Scope: Broad view, looking at how each channel contributes to conversions.
  • Usage: Ideal for understanding the effectiveness of each marketing channel individually.

Multi-Touch Attribution (MTA):

  • Focus: Analyzes individual touchpoints within the customer journey.
  • Scope: Detailed view, assigning value to each interaction a customer has before converting.
  • Usage: Helps understand the sequence and combination of interactions leading to conversions.

Key Differences:

  1. Granularity: MCA provides a channel-level analysis, while MTA offers a more granular, touchpoint-level analysis.
  2. Journey Mapping: MTA maps the entire customer journey, while MCA focuses on the effectiveness of individual channels.
  3. Budget Allocation: MCA helps allocate budgets across channels, while MTA aids in refining strategies based on touchpoint contributions.

Example Scenario:

  • MCA: Identifies email and social media as top-performing channels.
  • MTA: Reveals that social media initiates interest, while email nurtures and leads to conversions.

Benefits of Combining Both:

  • Comprehensive Insight: Combining MCA and MTA provides a holistic view of marketing effectiveness.
  • Optimized Strategy: Ensures better resource allocation and strategy refinement.

For more detailed insights on Rockerbox’s approach to attribution, visit Rockerbox’s Journey page.

No more confusion. Just real marketing insights.

Talk to our team about how Rockerbox can change the way you spend—for the better.